Skip to main content

The Second Damocles Sword

Drones, when they are used as an assassination tool instead of on a real battlefield, are extra-constitutional (not in accordance with the Constitution or international law) and counter-productive, because they likely produce exponentially more terrorists than they smite.  And they kill innocents.  And some deceptive definitions of terrorism and thus irrationally broad wavings of the wand has put our nation deep into an international quagmire.  One day, if drones are not banned by a multi-lateral international convention, many more nations than presently would have these drones, replicating the example that the U.S. has set, and this would exacerbate the problem of these drones on a world wide scale, and that would not be a happy time for the planet, and unfortunately this follows the same pattern as the setting off of the atomic bombs in 1945.  In other words, it seemed wise to some at the time, but in the long run it turned out to be very unwise. 

What's going on with drones seems to be more an assasination policy than anything else, and the decisions are often arbitrary in nature, so-called collateral damage is huge according to reports, and made by faceless bureaucrats and underlings with little accountability, and leaves one person (the president) as judge, jury and executioner -- who defers some of these decisions to others.  There is no intervening Court that could say this isn't right for one reason or another. 

Drones should at least be controlled by an international convention before it becomes the second Damocles sword over the world (nuclear weapons being the other) instead of over just certain countries.  The focus on terrorists should be narrow and strictly in self-defense.  An MSNBC commentator said that drones should be perfected so as to work more reliably, but we wouldn't wish the Drone Age of easy push-button assassinations on any future time or any world.

[revised on 3/18/2013] 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Broader Quagmire

The war, already the longest in American history, has spread to different theaters in different nations besides Afghanistan, most notably Iraq, and most Americans, unfortunately, pay little attention to it.  It is something that's just there in the national conscious, but  day-by-day or week-by-week coverage in the media is hardly noticeable. Though, we weren't around at the time, you get the feeling that World Wars I & II were covered comprehensively by the media of that time, and every citizen on the home front was paying attention to the reports of the battles.  The problem with these amorphous wars of the 21st century that are being waged in several countries around the world is that the U.S. political and military elite have decided on warring against a broader enemy as opposed to focusing on a narrower enemy as in the aforementioned world wars.  In other words, going to war against practically any militant who detests the U.S. rather than focusing on actual 9/11-type

Police Bullying in NM

MSNBC-TV showed video today about the New Mexico State Police terrorizing a family over an alleged speeding violation.  The family consisted of a woman and several children.  The police broke windows, fired shots, bullied, threatened, screamed at, and forced the woman and her kids to the ground, but naturally it is the family that is under charges instead of the police that acted unlawfully.  In a different case, in Washington D.C. several weeks ago, police officers fired shots at and killed a woman because her car rammed a barricade and she tried to get away, but they had no idea whether the ramming was intentional or accidental, nor did they care.  They used brute force against her rather than to simply capture and arrest her.  This is barbarism, and these are hardly isolated cases in the U.S.  Not only are top officers and officials of the defense establishment, which systematically brutalizes civilians in foreign adventures, and top officials of the N.S.A., which spies on law-abid

Persecution Follies

The Obama govt.'s heavy-handed prosecution of whistleblowers, or those people who uncover and tell the People about government wrongdoing -- or in the case of Bradley Manning (who released classified, though not top secret, information) about atrocities -- is unprecedented.  In effect, what the government is doing is trying to keep wrongdoing secret by threatening draconian-length prison terms to anybody who dares to let the nation know what's really going on.  Relating to these whistleblowers' uncovering of the truth, the American People are finally seeing the true face of this government and past governments, and it's not always good or righteous. [Originally published on Commoner on 5/18/2013 under a different title; revised on 6/4/2013.]