Skip to main content

Civilian Officials' Lies

Ex-President George W. Bush's provocative lies leading up to the invasion of Iraq in 2003 was highlighted on Rachel Maddow's MSNBC report ("Hubris: The Selling of the Iraq War"), tonight.  By time this essay is published, readers (especially, in the Mountain and Pacific Time Zones, Alaska and Hawaii) should still be able to see a re-broadcast of the program from the beginning, later on this evening.  It, basically, shows or implies that officials like Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, and George Tenet were all lying about Iraq and using the lies as a pretense to lead America into war.  Building on what already has been conventional knowledge, the program showed that Iraq had nothing to do with the September 11th, 2001 terrorist attacks in the United States.  As David Corn of Mother Jones magazine said, there have been no consequences for the criminal wrongdoings of these officials, such as being hauled off to the Hague en blanc for lying about this gravely serious matter. 

The Obama administration has been protecting these officials through the offices of wisecracking Eric Holder and even pressured European countries not to get involved with investigations and prosecutions.  On the other hand, why would a regime that could conceivably be put on the dock at the Hague itself for various international violations want to set a guidepost for doing anything else but to protect the former regime?  Condoleezza Rice is as worried about European prosecution as she is about Eric Holder, nevertheless, since she has had the audacity to travel there at least once in the last couple of years.  Only high-ranking civilian officials and some generals, by and large, should be blamed for the tragedy of Iraq. Our battle-experienced rank-and-file servicemen and servicewomen who were trusting, for the most part, their civilian leaders' words at the time, were mostly faithfully following orders.

Congressional candidate (Washington, 9th District), Mark Greene, is on record twice, in September, 2002 publications in the Anchorage Daily News (as a candidate for Congress in '02) for being against the resolution for war in Iraq, and once -- after the resolution passed and the '02 general election -- in the Winter of 2003, also in the Daily News. 

The Party of Commons believes that Greene's opposition to the Bush administration, particulary in the regime's early years, had something to do with the theft of the Washington - 9th District Primary in 2004 for the benefit of Paul Lord, although Lord was an unwitting beneficiary.

[Originally posted on Commoner on 2/18/2013; updated and revised on 2/20/2013].

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Police Bullying in NM

MSNBC-TV showed video today about the New Mexico State Police terrorizing a family over an alleged speeding violation.  The family consisted of a woman and several children.  The police broke windows, fired shots, bullied, threatened, screamed at, and forced the woman and her kids to the ground, but naturally it is the family that is under charges instead of the police that acted unlawfully.  In a different case, in Washington D.C. several weeks ago, police officers fired shots at and killed a woman because her car rammed a barricade and she tried to get away, but they had no idea whether the ramming was intentional or accidental, nor did they care.  They used brute force against her rather than to simply capture and arrest her.  This is barbarism, and these are hardly isolated cases in the U.S.  Not only are top officers and officials of the defense establishment, which systematically brutalizes civilians in foreign adventures, and top officials of the N.S.A., which spies on law-abid

The Broader Quagmire

The war, already the longest in American history, has spread to different theaters in different nations besides Afghanistan, most notably Iraq, and most Americans, unfortunately, pay little attention to it.  It is something that's just there in the national conscious, but  day-by-day or week-by-week coverage in the media is hardly noticeable. Though, we weren't around at the time, you get the feeling that World Wars I & II were covered comprehensively by the media of that time, and every citizen on the home front was paying attention to the reports of the battles.  The problem with these amorphous wars of the 21st century that are being waged in several countries around the world is that the U.S. political and military elite have decided on warring against a broader enemy as opposed to focusing on a narrower enemy as in the aforementioned world wars.  In other words, going to war against practically any militant who detests the U.S. rather than focusing on actual 9/11-type

Persecution Follies

The Obama govt.'s heavy-handed prosecution of whistleblowers, or those people who uncover and tell the People about government wrongdoing -- or in the case of Bradley Manning (who released classified, though not top secret, information) about atrocities -- is unprecedented.  In effect, what the government is doing is trying to keep wrongdoing secret by threatening draconian-length prison terms to anybody who dares to let the nation know what's really going on.  Relating to these whistleblowers' uncovering of the truth, the American People are finally seeing the true face of this government and past governments, and it's not always good or righteous. [Originally published on Commoner on 5/18/2013 under a different title; revised on 6/4/2013.]